Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Chevy Cruze 1.4t - Driver Demand tables

  1. #1
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Reading, PA
    Posts
    352

    Chevy Cruze 1.4t - Driver Demand tables

    My stock tune has negative values in the low pedal position MAP A, B and C tables. However, my current version of HPTuners forces them to zero. My version is 2.24.734.

    Is this going to be a problem when if I flash it again?
    2013 Cruze Eco - CAI, Catless DP, Catless MP, ZZP FMIC, Ported Intake Manifold, Mild tune (17psi), best 43.5mpg, 175ftlbs (pid)

    2008 Solstice GXP - ZFR 6758, catless, AEM stage 1 water/methanol injection, Hahn Racecraft Intercooler, solo street race cat back, LE5 throttle body - 307whp on a dyno dynamics (stock turbo numbers), 100 octane EFR6758 numbers - 463whp/454wtq

  2. #2
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    34
    Never tried it but I really don't think it will hurt anything. You cant get negative power from the engine anyway.

  3. #3
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    East TX
    Posts
    161
    Sure you can ... think engine braking.

    Issue ..? There's only one way to find out.

    I have noticed in logging pedal position and TPS that they most of the time correlate, not matched though, but a lot of the time at part throttle (think cruising down the highway and climbing a hill applying enough throttle to maintain) the TPS will read 100% while the pedal will only read 40-60. I think the worse that would happen is you would feel less engine breaking, but I don't think it would be an issue per say.
    Last edited by Flyer; 10-21-2014 at 11:11 AM.

  4. #4
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Reading, PA
    Posts
    352
    I was able to save the negative values by loading an older tune and manually changing the higher load cells rather than making compare values "zero". No harm, no foul. The negative values were generally in cells that would never be hit anyways, but I didn't want to chance it.
    2013 Cruze Eco - CAI, Catless DP, Catless MP, ZZP FMIC, Ported Intake Manifold, Mild tune (17psi), best 43.5mpg, 175ftlbs (pid)

    2008 Solstice GXP - ZFR 6758, catless, AEM stage 1 water/methanol injection, Hahn Racecraft Intercooler, solo street race cat back, LE5 throttle body - 307whp on a dyno dynamics (stock turbo numbers), 100 octane EFR6758 numbers - 463whp/454wtq

  5. #5
    Advanced Tuner caesar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Posts
    227
    Limits have been updated recently to allow negative values. Download the latest 2.24 version and try again. If you still can't enter negative values, e-mail support and include your OSID.

  6. #6
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Reading, PA
    Posts
    352
    Yea, it seems like there are a few weird things happening to "older" calibrations with the newer versions of 2.24 that I need to email support about. For example, 2002 jbodies do NOT have a knock retard PID available anymore lol.
    2013 Cruze Eco - CAI, Catless DP, Catless MP, ZZP FMIC, Ported Intake Manifold, Mild tune (17psi), best 43.5mpg, 175ftlbs (pid)

    2008 Solstice GXP - ZFR 6758, catless, AEM stage 1 water/methanol injection, Hahn Racecraft Intercooler, solo street race cat back, LE5 throttle body - 307whp on a dyno dynamics (stock turbo numbers), 100 octane EFR6758 numbers - 463whp/454wtq