Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: MAF question on LTFT tuning

  1. #1
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Canton OH
    Posts
    5

    MAF question on LTFT tuning

    I have a stock 2004 GTO with the only modification is LT Headers. I checked the fuel trims after the header install and was getting very high numbers. I did a test drive without the MAF and the numbers are decent. Attached is my tune, and a log with and without the MAF. Note I did reset the LTFT before each log file. The can runs great and pulls really good, have not seen any Knock either. Hate to mess with it too much, but would like to get the fuel trims back in line. Any suggestions?
    Attached Files Attached Files

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner mowton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,772
    Quote Originally Posted by JLowe5700 View Post
    I have a stock 2004 GTO with the only modification is LT Headers. I checked the fuel trims after the header install and was getting very high numbers. I did a test drive without the MAF and the numbers are decent. Attached is my tune, and a log with and without the MAF. Note I did reset the LTFT before each log file. The can runs great and pulls really good, have not seen any Knock either. Hate to mess with it too much, but would like to get the fuel trims back in line. Any suggestions?
    So when you say with and without MAF, I assume you are somehow disconnecting the MAF, is this correct?

    Putting Headers on the car will make it breath better and will lean the stock tune out. That is why you are seeing higher than normal Trims. With the MAF operational, you are running mostly off the MAF table with some transient correction from the VE table during accelerator pedal up and down events. With the MAF inop, the PCM will revert to Speed Density and will now begin fueling solely from the VE table. So my take on the whole situation is OEM MAF calibration is about where it should be but they have a tendency to set the stock VE table a bit richer as it is the "protection" when the MAF fails (same as disconnecting it) and is elevation sensitive. That is why the VE trims are a bit lower (still too high in my books) than the MAF readings.

    Ed M
    2004 Vette Coupe, LS2, MN6, Vararam, ARH/CATs, Ti's, 4:10, Trickflow 215, 30# SVO, Vette Doctors Cam, Fast 90/90, DD McLeod, DTE Brace, Hurst shifter, Bilsteins etc. 480/430

    ERM Performance Tuning -- Interactive Learning ..from tuning software training to custom tunes
    HP Tuners Dealer- VCM Suite (free 2hr training session with purchase), credits and new Version 2.0 turtorial available
    http://www.ermperformancetuning.com
    http://www.facebook.com/ERMPerformanceTuning

    [email protected]

  3. #3
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Canton OH
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by mowton View Post
    So when you say with and without MAF, I assume you are somehow disconnecting the MAF, is this correct?

    Putting Headers on the car will make it breath better and will lean the stock tune out. That is why you are seeing higher than normal Trims. With the MAF operational, you are running mostly off the MAF table with some transient correction from the VE table during accelerator pedal up and down events. With the MAF inop, the PCM will revert to Speed Density and will now begin fueling solely from the VE table. So my take on the whole situation is OEM MAF calibration is about where it should be but they have a tendency to set the stock VE table a bit richer as it is the "protection" when the MAF fails (same as disconnecting it) and is elevation sensitive. That is why the VE trims are a bit lower (still too high in my books) than the MAF readings.

    Ed M
    Thanks Ed. Yes, the MAF was just unplugged.