Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: 2016 5.7 tune

  1. #1

    2016 5.7 tune

    FWIW this is my tune on a 2016 5.7, M6, shaker.
    Long tube headers, catless mids, 3" flowmaster full system with super 44's, Holly sniper intake , stock TB, stock cam.
    Engine pulls hard to 6800 rpm
    Car is in garage for winter upgrades.
    Cam, and valvertrain components, head work, 90mm TB.
    Wanted to get close before can and other upgrades.
    Runs very strong as is and makes stock scats wish they had not tried LOL
    Maybe this will help someone in there tuning
    Attached Files Attached Files

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Speed39 View Post
    FWIW this is my tune on a 2016 5.7, M6, shaker.
    Long tube headers, catless mids, 3" flowmaster full system with super 44's, Holly sniper intake , stock TB, stock cam.
    Engine pulls hard to 6800 rpm
    Car is in garage for winter upgrades.
    Cam, and valvertrain components, head work, 90mm TB.
    Wanted to get close before can and other upgrades.
    Runs very strong as is and makes stock scats wish they had not tried LOL
    Maybe this will help someone in there tuning
    you forgot to mention e85 as well

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by malikib View Post
    you forgot to mention e85 as well
    Nope, Pump 93. I may try an e85 tune after the winter upgrades, but no knock retard with this tune. It will take a little more timing.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Speed39 View Post
    Nope, Pump 93. I may try an e85 tune after the winter upgrades, but no knock retard with this tune. It will take a little more timing.
    Really , 23 degrees on pump I can?t seem to get more than 15.5 on 91 without getting knock . I reached 19 with vp octane booster but that?s it although i only saw 5 hp difference with the addition of 4 degrees almost

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by malikib View Post
    Really , 23 degrees on pump I can?t seem to get more than 15.5 on 91 without getting knock . I reached 19 with vp octane booster but that?s it although i only saw 5 hp difference with the addition of 4 degrees almost
    Hmmm, Yep, this tune is a little on the lean side as well. I need to put a little more in the ve table. Keeping the vvt stock this was the tune. pulled great as well.
    Only difference is the VE. Both work great , also zero rpm hang .
    Attached Files Attached Files

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Speed39 View Post
    Hmmm, Yep, this tune is a little on the lean side as well. I need to put a little more in the ve table. Keeping the vvt stock this was the tune. pulled great as well.
    Only difference is the VE. Both work great , also zero rpm hang .
    i see that you changed the maf VS PERIOD , why is that ? these cars do not have a maf sensor
    also can i see a log of a couple pulls ?

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by malikib View Post
    i see that you changed the maf VS PERIOD , why is that ? these cars do not have a maf sensor
    also can i see a log of a couple pulls ?
    I didn't touch it. What ever is there was in stock tune . I can get ya a couple pulls but don't have a good one with the cam set to lock pin

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Speed39 View Post
    I didn't touch it. What ever is there was in stock tune . I can get ya a couple pulls but don't have a good one with the cam set to lock pin
    weird , i did a compare with the base version of your tune and thats why

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by malikib View Post
    i see that you changed the maf VS PERIOD , why is that ? these cars do not have a maf sensor
    also can i see a log of a couple pulls ?
    Attached Files Attached Files

  10. #10
    seems rich for an N/A don't you think ? i like running them at 12.5 but yours dips to 11.3 did you find that it made more power that way?

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by malikib View Post
    seems rich for an N/A don't you think ? i like running them at 12.5 but yours dips to 11.3 did you find that it made more power that way?
    yes it does, get a tad fat in a few spots. it seems to like it but has not been on a dyno to really see power numbers. I will do a 100% tune after the winter upgrades.
    Funny thing . Went back and looked at my original ecu read, the maf is different! Have no clue when or why I would of messed with that . Going to look at all my changes, see if i can pin point when it was changed.

  12. #12
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    271
    6800 rpm....I think thats out of power range, isnt it? Mine feels poor over 5800, even with 6.1 intake.
    Hope it will Change with the 6.4 cam.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by f.creek-ranch View Post
    6800 rpm....I think thats out of power range, isnt it? Mine feels poor over 5800, even with 6.1 intake.
    Hope it will Change with the 6.4 cam.
    Nope pulls hard all the way. I have a Holley sniper sheet metal intake on it right now, long tube headers , catless mids, ect. Doing cam, heads, 90mm TB this winter. Should make some good power then !!!

  14. #14
    Tuner PurpleRam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Quakertown PA
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by Speed39 View Post
    Nope pulls hard all the way. I have a Holley sniper sheet metal intake on it right now, long tube headers , catless mids, ect. Doing cam, heads, 90mm TB this winter. Should make some good power then !!!
    The Snipper comes alive after 6k , we had same results on one of the Rams I've been playing with
    02 ST...............8.90@156mph 4XXCi R5P7 NA 3200lbs ESTHP950
    04 GTX............9.91@138mph 441Ci G3Hemi NA 4000lbs ESTHP800
    04 SLT ..........12.22@115mph 345Ci G3Hemi NA4700lbs ESTHP550
    05 GTxtreme 10.15@133mph 426Ci G3Hemi NA 4000lbs ESTHP750
    G3 Hemi Videos

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClS...5mXdDR5sOxs10Q

  15. #15
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    271
    Amazing...I ve got the 6.1 Intake on the 5.7

    Feels a lot better at response and lower range but the high rpms are not that highlite...maybe ist geting better with headers....