I'm sure 99-2003 will work too for what I need it for.
I'm sure 99-2003 will work too for what I need it for.
2018 Camaro SS, Maggie 2650, 103 TB, Big Gulp, E85
Merry Xmas. 2 different OS ID's.
Regal GS Site Owner / HPT Moderator / FTV6 Mod
thanks, is there something I should know about OS id's?
2018 Camaro SS, Maggie 2650, 103 TB, Big Gulp, E85
Only the one meant for your vin will work, and GM did several, in some cases nearly a dozen OS's per vin #.
It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...
A wise man once said "google it"
Do you know how many other OS' there are for the 2000 year? I never heard this discussed on the Powrtuner website before, so this is news to me.
2018 Camaro SS, Maggie 2650, 103 TB, Big Gulp, E85
probably 20+
It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...
A wise man once said "google it"
thats odd MY stock a/f tps vs % table has values of 1 for 0-25%. The file you sent me has 0's across the board, I wonder why there is a difference.
Since this is a table I'm not familiar with I'm wondering what you guys have yours set at?
2018 Camaro SS, Maggie 2650, 103 TB, Big Gulp, E85
That is odd.. Usually only the 04+ GTPs have that table zeroed out stock.
hey devildog, I looked at the ve table on the second file you gave me and it doesn't look stock. Can you clear this up for me?
Last edited by GPGTP; 12-26-2007 at 01:17 AM.
2018 Camaro SS, Maggie 2650, 103 TB, Big Gulp, E85
Hmm. The first one results in "Definition failed to load" when trying to open it. The second, it opens. After looking at it, I can tell you why the stock "a/f tps vs % table" looks odd (all zeros). It appears to be a GT calibration vs GTP.
The PE Fuel Adder vs. TPS table should be set to 0. Note that values greater than 0 add to the AFR (leaner).Originally Posted by GPGTP
Russ Kemp
Originally Posted by Russ K
True, and Stock GTs have all zeroes from 97-03.. If you set it to all zeroes on a GTP, you can end up with some realllly rich low throttle PE.
No reason to lean the commanded PE with that table, just set the Base AFR vs ECT table to were you want it. Then also 0 the Add vs. RPM table. Now tune the Maf table to get the actual AFR to match the commanded.
Russ Kemp
I read it directly off of a stock gtp... right before we put it in the crusher.Originally Posted by GPGTP
Regal GS Site Owner / HPT Moderator / FTV6 Mod
I agree as well. I only use that table for VERY fine tuning (leaning) under low throttle, otherwise zero it out.Originally Posted by Russ K
Regal GS Site Owner / HPT Moderator / FTV6 Mod
Ok, I see. I prefer to use my VE table to make large adjustments apposed to the maf. It seems my car does use the ve table, but I'll confirm it 100%.
BTW I had the same problem with the first file.
2018 Camaro SS, Maggie 2650, 103 TB, Big Gulp, E85
If you still have your old PT program, you can turn out a stock bin in about 4 seconds! The OSID will be the one that matches your car and the HPT will be able to load it properly if the OSIDs are the ones registered to your car.Originally Posted by GPGTP
'99 Black GTP Sedan
3.4-2.6" PB Quick Change pulleys, Custom CAI, XP Cam, N* TB, LQ4 MAF, SLP headers, 42.5# Injectors, 180/195* thermostat.
13.501 @ 103.392 on 91 (2.4 60-foot).
13.82 @ 105.28 on 87 octane! (2.42 60-foot).
263kph top end as shown on the GPS.
All this and 39MPG to boot. What more can a man ask for?
* Just another enthusiastic amateur tuner! *
OMG, dude you are right, I just never made the connection.
2018 Camaro SS, Maggie 2650, 103 TB, Big Gulp, E85