Not having any luck tuning my virtual VE tables.

[DSteck]

I just set all three to the same just to be safe.

[turtlesdove3]

drum and bass

All I had to do was repopulate my MAF High table, but I don't think that's something you need to worry about because I'm pretty sure you only have one MAF table, and it goes out pretty far. Beyond that, I just had to populate the VE tables and that was it.

And how did you populate the tables, all I know is 'that thing is called an MAF table' ?

[07MontRedcp]

If you get the Greg Banish DVD he will show you how it's done.

BJK

[DSteck]

If you get the Greg Banish DVD he will show you how it's done.

BJK

The Banish CD doesn't show you how to repopulate a MAF table that has different labels on the axis, which is what happens when you change over to the enhanced OS on cars with a MAF High and MAF Low table.

[07MontRedcp]

True, but I thought his question was how to populate not how to set up the scanner.

BJK

[DSteck]

True, but I thought his question was how to populate not how to set up the scanner.

BJK

What I said has nothing to do with setting up the scanner. When you upgrade to the enhanced operating system, the labels on the MAF High table change, and consequently the whole table has to be repopulated with correct values.

[07MontRedcp]

I think you need to go back and take another look at the post by turtlesdove3. Notice how he only has 3 post to date. Also, checkout his profile. His join date is 6/10/10. Now carefully read what he wrote and see if you can understand why I recommended Greg's DVD to him. I bet even a 26 year old Project Engineer could figure this one out.

I spend a lot of time on this forum but seldom post because I still consider myself a beginner. One thing I have noticed is that sometimes the very knowledgable members tend to ignore questions by those that are just starting out or provide info that is way beyond where they are at. I see you posting all over this forum and others and I really appreciate your input, but sometimes you can be a little to full of yourself.

BJK

[HNK]

. One thing I have noticed is that sometimes the very knowledgeable members tend to ignore questions by those that are just starting out or provide info that is way beyond where they are at.
BJK[/QUOTE]

AGREED,

I have tried to get info from the knowledgeable members who discussing scaling and other related points, and they didnt reply to my questions. I decided to just to visit this forum every now and then and dont rely on getting info out of certain members.

[axekick]

I think that when a question has been answered a few times and it takes a while to explain it no one wants to spend time typing it out again. I see questions that I know the answer to sometimes but I don't always answer them for just that reason, I don't have time to answer whats already out there.

[HNK]

I agree when a question has been answered few times, and to be honest the person asking such a question get a link to the answer. Other times when a specific question is posted and then IM'd about A topic, no answer has been made available. Most regular members search about an answer but when not found then they ask for help, at least this is what i do.

[DSteck]

I think you need to go back and take another look at the post by turtlesdove3. Notice how he only has 3 post to date. Also, checkout his profile. His join date is 6/10/10. Now carefully read what he wrote and see if you can understand why I recommended Greg's DVD to him. I bet even a 26 year old Project Engineer could figure this one out.

I spend a lot of time on this forum but seldom post because I still consider myself a beginner. One thing I have noticed is that sometimes the very knowledgable members tend to ignore questions by those that are just starting out or provide info that is way beyond where they are at. I see you posting all over this forum and others and I really appreciate your input, but sometimes you can be a little to full of yourself.

BJK

He said the following:

And how did you populate the tables, all I know is 'that thing is called an MAF table' ?

Now please explain how the Greg Banish CD shows you how to fill in data for a table when you are converting from one set of axis labels to another?

Stock file labels:
5800,6000,6200,6400,6600,6800,7000,7200,7400,7600, 7800,8000,8200,8400,8600,8800,9000,9200,9400,9600, 9800,10000,10200,10400,10600,10800,11000,11200,114 00,11600,11800,12000,12200

Enhanced OS file labels:
5800,6100,6400,6700,7000,7300,7600,7900,8200,8500, 8800,9100,9400,9700,10000,10300,10600,10900,11200, 11500,11800,12100,12400,12700,13000,13300,13600,13 900,14200,14500,14800,15100,15400

Obviously, you can't just copy/paste from the original file into the enhanced file because the data won't match the labels, and consequently the entire curve will be wrong.

Now, having said that, Greg Banish's CD has nothing to do with this. While he would probably benefit from the DVD, it still isn't going to tell him squat on how to fill in the extended table. Sure, maybe your post was meant to be sarcastic, but it doesn't matter, because your smart-ass reply doesn't help any more than me just not posting anything. There's nothing full of myself, I simply got side tracked by you to make a note that Banish's CD doesn't show jack squat for this exact question.

As far as filling in the table, it's easy... Look at the values. 6100Hz is halfway between 6000 and 6200, so just take the average of the values for 6000 and 6200 and put it in 6100. This is only an approximation though, and there's another way to do it using 3rd order polynomial curve fitting, but anybody that knows curve fitting will work also knows how to do a 3rd order curve fit. If you intend to run MAF only, you can just fill in the VE tables with whatever numbers you want, because they'll never get used.