i learned something new today, i apparently dont know how to google well. i personally would never do it because its fudging the system which means it fudges all of its internal airflow analysis values which get used for things like traction control and threshold settings and table axis alignment.
the resolution isnt going to be great because the data is being compressed over the same oem axis array length. if you have seen a ve table for a p59 2 bar os upgrade then you know the resolution loss i speak of.
cylinder airmass is a internal calculation based off of air pressure, air temperature, and rpm at a minimum. this will be one of those "fudged values" as a result. i dont think you will necessarily have to account for this skewing because you will just be throwing values in as needed on the tables with those axis. yes it makes them difficult to track and yet another reason not to use this method. if you wish to calculate it manually then you'll need equations to go off of. check this link out for an explanation maybe it will help you. http://redhardsupra.blogspot.com/200...ss-models.html