Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Idle and initial drive tune support needed

  1. #1
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    6

    Idle and initial drive tune support needed

    Hi all,
    Looking for a bit of help in building out a tune to get the car idling and in a driveable state after upgrades.

    2000 LS1 out of a Camaro swapped into a 2002 Honda S2000. I had the motor, 100% stock with a LS6 MAF, mated to a slightly built T56. It was in the car for about a year, working out kinks with the swap before pulling it.

    Motor is ready to go back in after upgrades... I made a lot of changes and don't really know what to do to get it back running...

    Motor configuration I am looking to tune, coming from a 100% stock + LS6 MAF set-up. I highlighted what I think is most pertinent to the tune.

    • Trickflow 225 Heads, 63CC chamber, and powdered metal guides
      Brian Tooley Racing LS9 multilayer gasket, 7 layer
      Stock rockers with Smith Brothers Bronze bearing trunion kit
      Brian Tooley Racing 0.630" lift dual spring with steel retainers
      LS7 Lifter, Trays, running 7.475" 5/16 pushrods
      Brian Tooley Racing Stage 3 NA LS cam, Specs: 231/244 .630"/.615" 112.5+2.5, INTAKE LOBE LIFT @ TDC: 0.05810
      IWIS Single row chain
      Meling High Flow/Pressure Oil Pump
      FAST 102 Intake
      FAST 102 Big Mouth TB
      FAST 36lb/hr (378cc) Injectors

      GM LS2 Fuel Rail
      GM LS6 MAF out of a 2003 Z06
      Currently as NGK TR5 plugs


    I attached the last tune that was in the car. Speedo and related stuff is a bit of a mess to get the LS PCM to work with the stock S2000 dash. Car ran decent on the tune, no issues with AFR at WOT.

    I do have an wideband AFR and Oil Pressure gauge in the car.

    Any guidance on what to change in the tune to get it to idle is appreciated! I do plan on having it given a real good tuning with a local shop known for their work on LS motors later in the summer.

    05142021_ speedoadjust.hpt
    Last edited by SilverS2kV8; 1 Week Ago at 06:15 PM.

  2. #2
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    512

  3. #3
    Tuning Addict 5FDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    13,610
    FAST doesn't have proper data for HP Tuners, those are kinda worthless.
    2016 Silverado CCSB 5.3/6L80e, not as slow but still heavy.

    If you don't post your tune and logs when you have questions you aren't helping yourself.

  4. #4
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by 5FDP View Post
    FAST doesn't have proper data for HP Tuners, those are kinda worthless.
    I feel like this statement needs clarification. I'm using the FAST 303608, after a set of re-man GTP injectors stuck open on me. If the thread below is wrong, would be good to know.

    https://forum.hptuners.com/showthrea...b-hr-injectors

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by SteelDr89 View Post
    I feel like this statement needs clarification. I'm using the FAST 303608, after a set of re-man GTP injectors stuck open on me. If the thread below is wrong, would be good to know.

    https://forum.hptuners.com/showthrea...b-hr-injectors
    People reply with what they know. Fast is well known for not providing gm data, and most people have no idea that some have been cross-referenced to known data. If you look at the dates, that poster joined the forum 2 years after that thread was started. He probably has never seen it.

  6. #6
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    3,060
    The injector data is certainly not correct. Look at IFR. Here's the GTP data:
    https://forum.hptuners.com/showthrea...l=1#post745105

    It'd be ideal to get a different set of injectors. Actual GM ones with 100% factory data:
    https://forum.hptuners.com/showthrea...l=1#post766924

    Convert the tune to the 1bar SD OS. Tune VE and forget about the MAF.

  7. #7
    Senior Tuner edcmat-l1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    5BA8
    Posts
    3,562
    That cam will definitely run better in SD. 100%

    EFI specialist
    Advanced diagnostics, tuning, emissions
    HPtuners dealer and tech support
    email=[email protected]

  8. #8
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,970
    Those injectors are pretty easy to work with IMHO. I wouldn't change them. We use them in house for smaller builds in house although you'd have a hard time maxing them out NA.


    Post a log. A lot of initial start up stuff has issues to diagnose. Sensors not reading as they should. etc.

    I agree this would be best in speed density.
    Tuner at PCMofnc.com
    Email tuning!!!, Mail order, Dyno tuning, Performance Parts, Electric Fan Kits, 4l80e swap harnesses, 6l80 -> 4l80e conversion harnesses, Installs

  9. #9
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    6
    Thanks for the initial replies. Got some reading to do!
    I'll look into SD tuning as well.

    Motor goes back in car this weekend but probably won't being a position to start and log for another couple of weeks.

  10. #10
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by SiriusC1024 View Post
    The injector data is certainly not correct. Look at IFR. Here's the GTP data:
    https://forum.hptuners.com/showthrea...l=1#post745105

    It'd be ideal to get a different set of injectors. Actual GM ones with 100% factory data:
    https://forum.hptuners.com/showthrea...l=1#post766924

    Convert the tune to the 1bar SD OS. Tune VE and forget about the MAF.
    Thanks Sirius for the info. I was able to find all the places to input the 36lb GTP injectors you linked to but the last one. "Fuel to Wall" transient. I found something similar "Fuel to Wall Impact Factor" that has very similar labels but not exact. The Y axis goes in steps of 20 not 10 like in the excel sheet, and the X axis labels are slightly different. Is this the right spot to input these values or am I missing the spot to enter them?

  11. #11
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by edcmat-l1 View Post
    That cam will definitely run better in SD. 100%
    Edcmat, any threads that are worth reading on how to get started with an SD tune. I did a search and nothing popped out as being helpful. I did find a thread on LSTech outlining how to get the ECU into SD mode and initial start-up for tuning, but it lacked info for me to fully grasp what I was changing.