Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 29

Thread: Stock 5.3 with Headers the VE table had to be change by 20+% ???

  1. #1
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    20

    Lightbulb Stock 5.3 with Headers the VE table had to be change by 20+% ???

    Hey Guys, I could really use some guidance I AM NEW. I?ve got a stock 5.3L swapped into my G35 with just long tube headers for mods. I was working on tuning the MAF, but every time I made adjustments?like adding 10%?it didn?t seem to have any effect, and the car had trouble accelerating.

    I thought the MAF might be bad, so I disabled it to start tuning the VE table instead. That actually fixed the drivability issues, but I had to add over 20% fuel in some areas, and now some cells in the VE table are reading over 100%, which doesn?t feel right for a mostly stock setup.

    The engine has new plugs and wires also has 58 psi at the rails, so I?m starting to think something else might be wrong, and I?m just making it better by adjusting the VE table but not fixing the real problem. Does that sound right? I'd really appreciate any help figuring out what?s going on.

    File is stock besides MAF and VE tables, Ill post the tune and log when I get Home.

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,829
    This is usually because of fuel pressure issues. Make sure it has fuel pressure under heavy load/ high RPM
    [email protected] - [email protected]
    Email tuning!!!, Mail order, Dyno tuning, Performance Parts, Electric Fan Kits, 4l80e swap harnesses, 6l80 -> 4l80e conversion harnesses, Installs

  3. #3
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    20
    I'm certain the system maintains a constant 58 PSI at the pump and holds steady at 58 PSI at the fuel rails while idling. Today, I’ll check the pressure at the rails under load to confirm 58 psi under driving conditions.

    I was also told that the IAT sensor placement could be a problem because I have it right on the throttle body because its built into the MAF and If I am getting high IAT readings "Im not sure what a high temp would be 150+?" that can cause the VE model to be artificially higher from the ECM thinking the air density is less than it actually is. So ill be checking that today as well.

    The only other thing I have seen is with the key on, engine off check the MAP sensor reading and make sure it reflect my baro pressure to verify that the MAP sensor is calibrated and works correctly. Ill be doing that today as well.

  4. #4
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,256
    Quote Originally Posted by popmods View Post
    got a stock 5.3L swapped into my G35 .
    so you 5.3 has every intake piece, exactly how GM had it in the truck it came from the factory with?
    you only have headers? Every other piece of the exhaust is exactly how GM built it from the factory?

    --i bet you have some type of aluminum intake tube, headers, no cats, free flowing exhaust, performance muffler..

    all those things change the air going in and out of the engine.

    For me, i first tune BRAF, then VE, add timing, retune VE, add more timing, retune VE, then tune MAF, then hook up Wideband O2 and do WOT runs to tune upper VE/PE, then work on idle and cruise.

    im telling you this, as you said you are new. So im giving advice.

    BRAF first, then VE.

    Post up your tune and log files and we can help.

    .

  5. #5
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    20
    Full exhaust no cats with long tube headers the intake is exactly how GM had it in the truck, I don't have a aluminum intake tube because i don't have a tube at all the MAF is mounted right to the intake with a coupler.

  6. #6
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    405
    Posts
    3,214
    Putting the MAF right in front of the throttle body with a coupler is the worst place you can put it. You would be better off not using a MAF and tuning it in SD if that is the only place to locate it.

  7. #7
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    20
    Well that would make since why it did better in SD but why do you think I have to add so much to the VE table?

  8. #8
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    139
    Alvin mentioned likely why..

  9. #9
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    405
    Posts
    3,214
    Quote Originally Posted by popmods View Post
    Well that would make since why it did better in SD but why do you think I have to add so much to the VE table?
    Without seeing a tune and log no one can see what you are doing right or wrong.

  10. #10
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    20
    I?ll post it soon as I get home thanks.

  11. #11
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,256
    Quote Originally Posted by popmods View Post
    the intake is exactly how GM had it in the truck,.
    but, its not.

  12. #12
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    20
    Here is the Files
    Attached Files Attached Files

  13. #13
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,256
    well, put it back to the stock tune.

    youre adjusting too many things at once.
    your pe is flat
    you have little timing
    and your BRAF is too low

    put it back to stock, fail the MAF and tune the VE first.

  14. #14
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    20
    I haven't touched anything but the VE table so really its a stock file besides the MAF is failed out and VE table has been changed. I will Put it back to stock and start over.

  15. #15
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,256
    st+lt trims show youre not too far off on your log

    ard.jpg

  16. #16
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,256
    Quote Originally Posted by popmods View Post
    II will Put it back to stock and start over.
    post up your stock tune so we can compare it.

  17. #17
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    20
    Look how much I had to change the VE table
    Attached Files Attached Files

  18. #18
    Senior Tuner 04silverado6.0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2021
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    1,839
    Start with this file. Your stoich was flatlined but flex fuel enabled? What injectors and fuel pressure regulator? Double check injector data.
    Attached Files Attached Files

  19. #19
    Tuning Addict edcmat-l1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    5BA8
    Posts
    5,447
    Quote Originally Posted by popmods View Post
    I'm certain the system maintains a constant 58 PSI at the pump and holds steady at 58 PSI at the fuel rails while idling. Today, I’ll check the pressure at the rails under load to confirm 58 psi under driving conditions.
    That's the typical response right up until the person puts a gauge on the vehicle and realizes it doesn't.

    EFI specialist
    Advanced diagnostics, tuning, emissions
    HPtuners dealer and tech support
    email=[email protected]

  20. #20
    Tuning Addict edcmat-l1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    5BA8
    Posts
    5,447
    Injector data.jpg

    You've got Flex fuel injector data. I'd bet they aren't flex fuel injectors and this is going to be your root cause.
    Last edited by edcmat-l1; 1 Week Ago at 07:33 AM.

    EFI specialist
    Advanced diagnostics, tuning, emissions
    HPtuners dealer and tech support
    email=[email protected]