Page 11 of 30 FirstFirst ... 78910111213141521 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 220 of 582

Thread: AEM 30-0300 Wideband with direct CAN integration W/ VCMScanner. Need beta testers.

  1. #201
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,344
    Yes, sorry, the basic EE knowledge part of my brain was apparently not working this morning.
    Post a log and tune if you want help

    VCM Suite V3+ GETTING STARTED THREADS / HOW TO's

    Tuner by night
    CPX Tuning
    2005 Corvette, M6
    ECS 1500 Supercharger
    AlkyControl Meth, Monster LT1-S Twin, NT05R's
    ID1000's, 220/240, .598/.598, 118 from Cam Motion

    2007 Escalade, A6
    Stock

  2. #202
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,344
    Woohoo, wideband shipped today. Should have it Tuesday.

  3. #203
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by dr.mike View Post
    It can be used on pre-2008 cars w/ HPTuners 3. But, it requires the installation of an extra resistor in the wiring, to provide termination, since there is no CAN ECU to provide it.
    Trying to wrap my head around this fully as a non-EE. For a pre-CAN vehicle PCM such as a LS1B, bringing the two 30-0333 device's CAN wires (with appropriate 60 ohm resistor between them) to the appropriate spots in the OBD-2 connector where the CAN-equipped vehicles have them (pin 6 CAN high, pin 14 CAN low), will allow the MPVI unit to bring in the CAN data. That is, the MPVI will essentially be bringing in two different data streams simultaneously- CAN and VPW. The 3.0 scanner can log the data from both streams and display the results simply by choosing the appropriate PID or channel.

    Is that an accurate assessment?

  4. #204
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    115
    Since I use EFI alot all my widebands are serial and have been using serial for 10 years with it, once 3.0 came out I started using serial with HPT. Being in and out of vehicles all the time is there a benefit to this over serial being I still tune pre 08 vehicles still or is it not practical?

  5. #205
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,344
    I believe this way receives data faster than serial. dr.mike would know for sure though.

  6. #206
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    604
    The CAN data is faster and better time-correlated with the other PID data than the serial data.

    Serial data is, usually, limited to something like 10Hz/100ms. The CAN data is available at 100Hz/10ms. And, can be faster than that.

    The serial data takes a different path through windows than the MPVI data. So, there can be ( usually is ) a time skew.

  7. #207
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,344
    And there we have it.

  8. #208
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave_62 View Post
    Trying to wrap my head around this fully as a non-EE. For a pre-CAN vehicle PCM such as a LS1B, bringing the two 30-0333 device's CAN wires (with appropriate 60 ohm resistor between them) to the appropriate spots in the OBD-2 connector where the CAN-equipped vehicles have them (pin 6 CAN high, pin 14 CAN low), will allow the MPVI unit to bring in the CAN data. That is, the MPVI will essentially be bringing in two different data streams simultaneously- CAN and VPW. The 3.0 scanner can log the data from both streams and display the results simply by choosing the appropriate PID or channel.

    Is that an accurate assessment?
    dr. mike,

    for the people with pre-CAN vehicles that would like to use this setup, is the above statement accurate?

  9. #209
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,344
    That is what he said.

  10. #210
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    604
    Pretty much. yeah. Although, it maty be easier to solder the resistor in to the wires than the connector.

  11. #211
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,824
    Are any of you having trouble with the PID for the CAN AEM on 3.2? I can't locate the PID anywhere.
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400

  12. #212
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    604
    I have not tried 3.2 yet.

  13. #213
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,344
    Have you tried re polling? My WB will be here today so I'll try it this evening

  14. #214
    Senior Tuner 10_SS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    1,320
    Quote Originally Posted by LSxpwrdZ View Post
    Are any of you having trouble with the PID for the CAN AEM on 3.2? I can't locate the PID anywhere.
    I have not tried 3.2 due to this concern, but are you saying it doesn't come up in the channels list even when your looking/adding it like it did in 3.0 or 3.1?
    2010 Camaro LS3 (E38 ECU - Spark only). MS3X running complete RTT fuel control (wideband).
    Whipple 2.9L, 3.875" Pulley, kit injectors, supplied MSD Boost-A-Pump, stock pump
    LG Motorsports 1 7/8" Headers - No Cats, stock mid pipe with JBA Axle Back
    ZL1 Wheels/Tires

  15. #215
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,824
    Quote Originally Posted by schpenxel View Post
    Have you tried re polling? My WB will be here today so I'll try it this evening
    I can't... Remote/email tuning the car. I just setup a channel config in 3.0 and going to see if it'll transfer over to 3.2.
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400

  16. #216
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,344
    It has arrived











  17. #217
    Tuner iced98lx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sioux Falls, SD
    Posts
    58
    Is the power pigtail coming off the ODB2 connector? Meaning, you would hook sensor to extension to gauge and ODB2 to gauge and ODB2 to power?

  18. #218
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,344
    No, there are two separate wires for power that don't connect to obd port. It's hard to see on the pictures though. I don't think there's enough power available on the obd plug but I'll probably try it and find out
    Post a log and tune if you want help

    VCM Suite V3+ GETTING STARTED THREADS / HOW TO's

    Tuner by night
    CPX Tuning
    2005 Corvette, M6
    ECS 1500 Supercharger
    AlkyControl Meth, Monster LT1-S Twin, NT05R's
    ID1000's, 220/240, .598/.598, 118 from Cam Motion

    2007 Escalade, A6
    Stock

  19. #219
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    VT
    Posts
    39
    According to the specifications the 30-0300 draws peak 3amps

  20. #220
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,344
    I wonder what's available on the obd port? I saw something saying it shares a fuse with the cigarette lighter so maybe it does have enough?